Skip to main content

Early Morning Thoughts, September 15, 2020

The Shutdown of America is 100% Illegal

It’s funny (peculiar) how a single event or observation can change your own views of a subject.  Take, for example, the lock-down of America that has happened during the last six months.  Many of us, as uninformed as we might be, believed the threats and force used by federal and state governments to shut us down and kill our economy, were simply wrong headed as hell.  And yet, most Americans have complied with all of the stay at home, wear a mask, practice social distancing state mandated rules, etc.  Why did we do that?  I suspect it is because we have been taught fear and have been taught blind obedience to government mandates by the government schools.  Why has that been a government process – i.e. to teach us fear and obedience?  Simple.  Rulers like to rule others, and they don’t like resistance to their rules.

Small businesses have been destroyed because of the government declared medical pandemic.  People have died as a result of the lockdown.  However, it appears now that relatively low numbers of people have been affected by the alleged ‘new’ virus, a virus, which BTW, has still eluded a clear definition.  In fact, evidence is now showing us that the Covid-19 impact on America has been less than the impact of the annual flu.  Really.  And what about the medical belief that viruses cannot be transferred from one individual to another?  Sweden did not lock down anyone, nor did they force anyone to wear masks, and their covid contributing death rates are below those of the US.

So, why is the US government and our state governments demanding that we conform to all their alleged ‘emergency’ mandates, and are the mandates lawful?  And, does an emergency situation allow the government to operate outside the law?  I don’t think so.  This most recent medical attack on America was sudden and surprising to most Americans, and was accompanied by the many big city riots and man made west coast fires, and everything that happened this spring and summer should be questioned.  Something is wrong.  Something is amiss.  We are under attack by people who allegedly are in place to actually defend and protect us.  But they are not really in place to defend or protect us from any attacks.  They simply want to control us.  I’ll leave aside the largely Soros funded rioters and fire starters because they are outside the main subject of this discussion.

Going back to my first sentence on this post, what helped me to understand the whole pandemic situation better, was a YouTube video created by Peggy Hall in which she interviewed John Jay Singleton, a Florida Attorney.  (See – In case YT censors this interview, it is also available on BitChute.).  The whole interview is 1:41 hours long, and if you are interested after the first fifteen minutes or so, you should watch the whole interview.  It’s a keeper.  IMO.

The Singleton interview focus was initially about Sprouts and its mask requirement rules being imposed on all customers.  But, Sprouts is a public entity – they serve the public in general.  Sprouts is not a private membership organization with its own registered members and rules – it’s a business that is open to the public.  ‘Here, we’re open for business – come buy our products.’  Note that the legal rules that control public entities also control Sprouts and all other businesses that serve the public.  ALL of them.

Basically, you should know that it’s illegal for an employee to stop you from entering a business that is open to the public simply because you are not wearing a mask.  Aside from being unconstitutional (first and fourteenth amendments), it is also discriminatory, and discrimination acts are against the law.  If you are prevented from entering any public business, it is also an act of unlawful restraint and unlawful imprisonment, both actions of which are also against the law.

So, it appears clear that the state and federal governments have no problem violating the law, and Singleton observes that this is likely a test scenario in which the government is pushing new frontiers in law breaking in an effort to see how far the American people can be pushed.  The unlawful activity is also a well funded activity, with every politician who can be bought being bought.  The solution to this lawless activity is for the people to push back, not bow their heads in submission.

I live in Colorado on the west slopes of the Rockies, and life here is pretty casual.  But, even with that, because I refuse to wear a facial mask, I am not able to get a local haircut.  In my nearest hospital, I cannot enter without a mask.  Both of these service organizations are open to the public, but one is medical.  In the other case (the barber), he/she can probably refuse to cut my hair.  In the case of the hospital, however, the refusal of service is not so clear cut.  The hospital does have, for instance, an emergency room service, and I suspect it cannot force incoming ER patients to have a mask on, can they?  But for regular hospital visitors (people like me), they do force the wearing of the mask.  I call that discrimination, and have filed a complaint with the hospital compliance department, which will, in turn, consult with their attorney to help resolve the dispute.  I have no idea how this will turn out.

In Colorado, the anti-discrimination laws (2016 Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 24 – Government – State Principal Departments, Article 34 – Department of Regulatory Agencies, Part 6 – Discrimination in Places of Public Accommodation, § 24-34-601. Discrimination in places of public accommodation – definition found here: states pretty clearly “It is a discriminatory practice and unlawful for a person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from, or deny to an individual or a group, because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation…”

When filing my discrimination complaint with the hospital, I asked how and why did the hospital have this mask policy.  I did not get a clear answer, but I suspect the mask is for political or business reasons and not for medical reasons, and I referenced that belief in my complaint.  Certainly the medical profession must know the medical truth about covid by now, so why are they playing a political game with patients?  Who benefits, and how much do they benefit from the lawless restriction?  Are hospital patients being thrown under the bus in order to maintain control over the subject matter?  Should we no longer trust hospitals?  What about doctors?  Can they be trusted?

I raise these questions because I want some amount of normality returned to my own country, and when I use the term ‘normality’ I am talking about the normality as experienced by Joe Sixpack, lower or middle class family man – I don’t care about the rich and powerful who are causing all of this death and destruction.  Screw the Bill Gates type of rich and powerful – let them eat toast.

I suspect that our ability to understand and control these recent government attacks on us will depend on how well informed we are, whether or not we will continue to ask questions of all government employees, and whether or not we are willing to tell government ‘Enough – no more.’  If we want to restore control over government, we have to put them on notice and tell them we do not consent to any of these wars on nouns, false flag attacks, and psyops events.  If government cannot abide by our system of laws, then we will abolish it.  And for God’s sake – refuse the mandatory vaccination!  It’s just another life killer and income source for Bill Gates – it is NOT a life saver.

My suggestion with regard to dealing with any level of government is to be polite, be patient, be observant, make certain that your position is known, and take notes.  And when you state your position, if it is refused or rejected, say ‘thank you’ and take the case to the next level.  But do not surrender.  In the Peggy Hall interview, I really like Singleton’s attitude.  The video interview is a good one.

Have a nice day, and think good thoughts.  You are important, and you are a good person.  Think that way, regardless of how badly members of the government treat you – if there are problems, the ones with the problems are those who work in the government – not you.



  • Highlander says:

    Tom, Thanks for your thoughts. I think we are in total agreement. What you did not include is that Mossad has a desk inside Langley, and that there is, even now, no evidence that an actual covid virus exists. I suspect also that an actual biological agent that could kill billions of us at once would also have a negative effect on the same lawless cretins who initiated it, so they have to be careful and commit only genocide, rather than suicide. They are after all, not god’s chosen ones, nor are they gods themselves. Welcome to humanity, eh?

    I’m not certain if you have read this document, but it describes much more of the talmud problem than either of us have discussed here.

  • Tomjoad says:

    Covid, and most everything about the entire rump presidency is another massive psyop to further the banking dynasty families’ jnew world order totalitarian agenda. Donald t entered the fold of the world controllers when he took the place of a known cia agent in their big money laundering operation known as resorts international casinos, which was incidentally, started by cia and mossad. Note the owners of resorts: Rothschild, tibor rosenbaum (Israel’s hidden Swiss banker,) and Meyer lansky (the mobs jewish brain.) on another side note see how rosenbaum and lansky killed John f Kennedy for the bankers through Permindex and etc… They bailed the Donald out of bankruptcy through Wilbur Ross of Rothschild incorporated because they thought they might use him later as a showman in their show government, and surprise surprise look who trump picked to be “our” US Secretary of Commerce… They put trump in their White House BECAUSE he represented abject failure on every sociopolitical economic and moral level, and this is the message they want everyone to get: USA is not number one anymore. Lower the USA for the greater rise of their more totalitarian global police state. Covid is ridiculous emperor wears no clothes nonsense, but we’re so dumb, we are getting what we deserve. Certainly they could engineer us up a more potent virus that would kill billions of us immediately, but they have to make it look good so they don’t get blamed.

  • Highlander says:

    Charles, thanks for your comments. I’d be interested in knowing your specialty in law and in which state you practice. I find it interesting that, of the several items I addressed, you focused on the mandatory facial mask issue. In my opinion, it is merely one part of the whole covid fraud. Let me comment.

    While I appreciate your view, you must also agree that not all state and federal executive orders are lawful. We saw this in California when the governor was successfully sued by two members of the state legislature because the governor was, in fact, writing new law, a function belonging exclusively to the state legislature, and not allowed to the executive and judicial branches of government. The governor was operating outside constitutional law. How many other state governors have done the same thing?

    In my own state of Colorado I have searched unsuccessfully for the underlying law that allows our own governor to impose these covid medical mandates on healthy people. And why did my own governor ask and receive the state’s emergency designation for Colorado from POTUS Trump? Was there no obvious medical emergency in Colorado? How did Trump know there was an emergency in Colorado? Let’s not forget that because a state of emergency is declared, there is no legal justification for anyone in government ignoring or violating either federal or state constitutional law. And yes, most emergency declarations only last 30 days. So, how is it possible that the state of emergency is still in effect [rhetorical question]?

    But, interestingly enough, 23 countries identified the same covid pandemic emergency on the same day. Think about that. Is that credible? I don’t think so. It sounds planned to me. And, inasmuch as I am not terribly fond of FDR, he did make one point that I often agree with: “In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.” ― Franklin D. Roosevelt

    It is my opinion that the whole covid alleged emergency is, in fact, a planned political shutdown of most western countries, and is based on medical fraud and government enforced mandates, not on any actual medical evidence. In fact, a recent Johns Hopkins report (which was almost immediately taken down and revised) pointed out that according to CDC’s own records, from early February until early September, 2020, there was no increase in the death rate of Americans. I obtained the original, unmodified report from the Internet WayBack Machine, and you can view it here:

    In summary, it appears 1) there is no covid medical epidemic, 2) flu involved deaths simultaneously have almost disappeared while covid involved death figures have appeared, 3) death rates in the USA have been quite normal during the measured epidemic, 4) millions of healthy people have been needlessly locked in their own homes, 5) tens of thousands of small businesses have been needlessly destroyed, 6) medical authorities have shown us that wearing a facial mask is unhealthy as we see in this report.

    It appears from medical evidence that 1) the masks do not work as advertised by government, 2) that most people do not know how to wear them properly, 3) That many people have or will suffer from wearing facial masks, 4) that children are not vulnerable to the alleged pandemic, 5) other reports show the experimental vaccine will be deadly to many people.

    I hope this is the kind of response you were looking for. There is so much more, but I did not want to write a book. 😉

  • Charles Vekert says:

    I am an attorney, and I can assure you that state and federal regulations, orders, and laws requiring masks during this pandemic are perfectly legal. It has been a function of government for thousands of years to protect the health and safety of its subjects or citizens. The question can be asked: Are masks effective at slowing the rate of transmission of Covid? The state and federal government does not have to prove effectiveness to a certainty. They only have to have, under the law, a reasonable basis for this belief. The courts will not substitute their judgements for that of the other branches of government as long as the belief is reasonable. Given that almost all scientists advocate wearing masks, it is reasonable for governments to act on their advice.

    Even if it is a good idea to wear masks, requiring it must be constitutional. There is no constitutional prohibition against laws such as this. Traffic laws impede drivers’ behavior much more than this mask requirement. No one thinks you can go around shooting your gun in the city. Right now, and there are 400,000 dead as I write, it is too dangerous to let people shooting their air droplets around them. Maskless people are restrained from hurting others in various stores. It is a good idea.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.